Home / News / Millions in Public Procurement, “Ghost Workers,” and Fake Exemptions: How the Prosecutor’s Office Investigates Corruption in Luhansk Military Administrations

Millions in Public Procurement, “Ghost Workers,” and Fake Exemptions: How the Prosecutor’s Office Investigates Corruption in Luhansk Military Administrations

Nov 3, 2026, 3:18:52 PM

Today, November 3, 2026, an open online meeting took place between the leadership of the Luhansk Regional Prosecutor’s Office, civil society representatives, and regional media, titled "Dialogue with the Public: Current Challenges and Operational Priorities". The event was framed as an initiative to ensure maximum transparency and directly discuss performance results achieved during the current year.

However, despite formal commitments to transparency, the sharpest exchanges focused on an issue that has long been inconvenient: why the full-scale war and the temporary occupation of the region failed to halt financial abuses among relocated officials, and why concrete indictments are only now surfacing?


According to Regional Prosecutor Anton Yevtushenko, investigators are currently providing procedural oversight in more than 11 criminal proceedings involving officials across regional, municipal, and district military administrations. Four officials have already received formal notices of suspicion: three held posts within the Luhansk Regional Military Administration, and one served at the municipal level.

The Question from "De l’autre côté du dialogue" Left Unanswered on Air

The editorial team of "De l’autre côté du dialogue" prepared for today’s session specifically to address a fundamental question, which was submitted in writing:

"The impression is that the embezzlement of public funds had been occurring for years, yet only in the current year has the system begun delivering tangible outcomes in the form of notices of suspicion and cases brought before the courts. What changed in 2026? Is this tied to tightened oversight of budgetary funds allocated to Luhansk, or did the principle of inevitable punishment finally take effect due to personnel changes within the agency itself?"

No response was delivered on air, as the moderators cited strict scheduling limits and a lack of remaining time. Nonetheless, an analysis of the facts presented and the trajectory of these investigations allows conclusions to be drawn directly.

The breakthrough observed in 2026 stems from two core factors. First, a comprehensive leadership overhaul occurred mid-year: Regional Prosecutor Anton Yevtushenko and his First Deputy Andriy Sapsay took office in the summer of 2026. The incoming leadership arrived free of allegiances or deference toward local administrative elites, who had long operated under an informal immunity granted by martial law. Second, complex inquiries into 2023–2024 procurement files have finally cleared the bottleneck of forensic accounting and product-valuation assessments, which were required to formulate legally sound charges.

Misappropriation in Public Communications and Municipal Budgets

First Deputy Prosecutor of Luhansk Region Andriy Sapsay highlighted several high-profile cases currently nearing completion or already before the courts:

  • Embezzlement in the Regional Administration: Charges under Article 191, Part 4 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine were served to the Director of the Department of Mass Communications of the Luhansk Regional Administration, her deputy, and a private contractor. Between March and September 2026, abusing their official authority contrary to service interests, they appropriated over 400,000 UAH in public funds. All implicated individuals have been suspended from duty while investigators identify the full scope of accomplices.
  • Losses in the Sievierodonetsk Administration: An indictment against the former head of a department within the Sievierodonetsk Military-Civil Administration was forwarded to court over the misappropriation of more than 850,000 UAH.
Nepotistic Draft-Exemption Schemes

Law enforcement is also targeting the misuse of public office to secure illicit draft exemptions.

In Sievierodonetsk, an unlawful arrangement was uncovered involving the Head of the Financial Department of the Municipal Military Administration, who arranged fictitious employment for her brother at a local communal enterprise solely to grant him state mobilization deferment. Formal notices of suspicion have been served to both the financial director and the head of the municipal utility.

The court imposed pre-trial detention with bail set between 200,000 and 266,000 UAH. The prosecutor's office clarified that suspension requests have not been filed at this point because all relevant personnel and financial files, computers, and mobile phones were seized during searches, neutralizing risks of evidence destruction or witness intimidation.

Millions in Medical Equipment: Warehoused Supplies and Conflicting Expert Reports

Healthcare expenditures prompted sharp debate. Civil society monitors revisited large-scale purchases made in 2023–2024 (notably for hospitals in Lysychansk, Sievierodonetsk, and the regional oncology center) totaling hundreds of millions of hryvnias, where high-value equipment sat boxed in warehouses for months.

The prosecutor’s office confirmed that these transactions remain under active investigation, noting the unique operational challenges involved:

  • Preserving Manufacturer Warranties: Warranty periods for advanced medical equipment only begin upon unpacking and installation. Investigators had to coordinate with certified technical specialists to open the crated equipment and document serials without voiding service protections.
  • Defense Counter-Assessments: Defense teams have repeatedly sought to challenge official damage calculations by submitting private expert appraisals reflecting conflicting valuations. In response, the prosecutor's office petitioned the Ministry of Justice to audit the licenses of these experts and hold non-compliant appraisers accountable.
Court Updates on Former Top Officials

The prosecutor’s office also provided status updates on trials involving former leadership figures:

  • Roman Vodianyk: A case consolidating three indictments (spanning five counts of embezzlement and official negligence under Art. 191 Part 5 and Art. 367 Part 2) is currently before the Central District Court of Dnipro. An additional indictment regarding unlawful financial benefit (Art. 368 Part 5) was referred to court in September 2026.
  • Kuzminov (Former Deputy Head of Sievierodonetsk Administration): Charged under Art. 367 Part 2, his trial has been ongoing in the Samariv Interdistrict Court of Dnipropetrovsk Region since 2023; the examination of prosecution evidence is currently underway.
  • Volchenko (Former Head of Sievierodonetsk Education Department): Her case, active since 2023 in the Zhovtnevy District Court of Dnipro, is concluding witness cross-examinations before moving to closing arguments.
  • Stryuk (Former Head of Sievierodonetsk Administration): The regional prosecutor's office clarified that it does not exercise procedural oversight in any inquiries concerning him.

The prosecutor’s office emphasized that monitoring expenditures across military administrations remains an ongoing, daily priority. Due to the complex nature of forensic examinations, several investigations remain confidential to prevent suspects from tampering with evidence. Further procedural filings and court verdicts are expected in the coming months.

Кількість коментів у цієї статті: 0

Залишити коментар

Вашу адресу електронної пошти не буде опубліковано.